{"id":798,"date":"2004-02-26T22:10:01","date_gmt":"2004-02-26T22:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/random-average.com\/?p=798"},"modified":"2004-02-26T22:10:01","modified_gmt":"2004-02-26T22:10:01","slug":"amberite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/2004\/02\/amberite\/","title":{"rendered":"Amberite"},"content":{"rendered":"

There’s a game I’d like to write up in full that I never will. Two reasons:
\nOne is simply that almost all of the mechanics of the thing are based off of a great indie game called Trollbabe. While the author might be (in fact, probably is) down with people riffing off his game, to do him justice I should be charging for it and making sure he gets his due. This conflicts with the second thing; making money off of it would be illegal, in that setting a game in Amber is the right of someone else in the gaming world. (Not that they’re doing<\/i> anything with that right, but there it is.)
\nAnyway.
\nSo, the only way I could do it as a complete rules set for Amber would be to make it free, which screws the original game’s author, which I won’t do.
\nSo this is best I can do: kind of an OGL “You must own this book to use these rules” type of deal — go buy Trollbabe, by Ron Edwards<\/a>. Just do it. It’s ten damn dollars and probably the best money you’ll spend, per dollar, on any game. If you disagree I’ll pay you back.
\nJesus, still hedging?
\nWell, you can go read the review here<\/a>, which should give you enough rough understanding of the rules to get you though the rest of the post, but really you should just cough up the tenner.
\nFor those of you who’ve got Trollbabe, but don’t know about the setting of Amber, go buy the five books of Roger Zelazny’s Nine Princes in Amber<\/i> series and read them, or just ignore this post.
\nNow then, you’ve bought. You’ve read.
\nEveryone on the same page? Good. Let’s try out a game called Amberite<\/i>.<\/p>\n


\nI’ve asked this before: What is an Amberite?<\/b>
\nHere’s my<\/i> answer.
\nSimply put, an Amberite is somewhere between a human and a god — functionally different (vaguely noir), and tied into a setting thick with conflict: political, familial, violent, romantic… you name it, they’ve got it. An Amberite might be a friend or enemy of any other characters in the setting, but one thing they aren’t ever<\/u> going to be is neutral<\/i>.
\nIn old-school RPG terms, an Amberite’s Race is Protagonist; their character class is Catalyst — it’s what they do<\/i>, it’s who they are<\/i> — their presence cannot help but mess the status quo in any particular situation. Things happen<\/i> when they arrive.
\nThe story is always about them… just ask them.
\nTrollbabe<\/b> is a role-playing game by Ron Edwards (creator of the excellent Sorcerer). It lets you tell stories like that.
\nHow do I use the game to do Amber?<\/b><\/u>
\nMost of the character generation stuff is the same. Pick your number. The three stats that derive off of that work the same way, but some get different names: Fighting<\/i> becomes… Prowess<\/i> (or whatever trips your trigger), Magic<\/i> becomes Powers<\/i>, and Social<\/i> stays the same.
\nSpecialties<\/u><\/i> work a bit differently for the Powers stat: Whatever you pick as your Powers specialty is at the normal value; every other Power you have is at -2 from the normal value (unless that would take the chance of success below the range of possible numbers, in which case it just drops to minimum). Such secondary powers (of which you might not have any or might have a half-dozen) must be acquired through play or okayed by the GM if desired at the start of play (a good rule of thumb might be to allow Number\/3 in secondary powers at the start of play, but YMMV.)
\nI doubt I need to give a list of standard ‘canon’ Powers to anyone familiar with Amber. \ud83d\ude42
\nSome GM’s may want to add a rule in which the areas that you don’t pick as your Prowess speciality are at -2 or -1 as well. I wouldn’t, but some might. Ditto Social specialties, though my resistance there is much lower — it might be more useful and thematic there for someone whose Social speciality is “Scary” to face a penalty when trying to charm someone at a party.
\nScale<\/u><\/i> is terribly useful when playing Amberite; all the Elders have a Scale associated with them — by default, when dealing with an Elder as a starting PC, you are operating at a smaller Scale than the Elder and suffer penalties accordingly. I’d start the most powerful elders at the highest Scale in the game (“state” or at least “demesne”) and work down from there. I might also add a step or two to the scale for things like Dworkin, Oberon, and the Unicorn.
\nCharacter progression is easy: as the PC’s own scale rises, they move closer to playing at the Scale of the Elders.
\nScenario setup in Trollbabe includes the determination of any built-in penalties and bonuses for the setting\/story, and this works well for Amberite as well: Being in Amber is -2 or -3 to most Powers<\/i> checks, while being near the Courts is probably the reverse. Read the Trollbabe rules and examples will occur to you.
\nFinally (and best of all), this game is based on a diced mechanic that relies so intrinsically on story-telling that it utterly obliterates the ‘d20’ problem of deprotagonizing your character through failures that don’t ‘work’ with you character concept. You can<\/u> fail, certainly, but when that happens you will always fail on terms that work within the concept of your character’s story. It’s one of the most powerful concepts in the game…. any<\/u> game, for that matter.
\nWhy<\/i> would I use the game to do Amber?<\/b><\/u>
\nIt’s my personal opinion that one of the main reasons that the players who play Amber do so because they desire more control over the story — by playing in the Amber setting, you have a tremendous amount of say over what’s happening to your character and the world around them — it’s that kind of setting. (Maybe not that kind of game<\/i> (vanilla ADRPG), but that kind of setting.)
\nTrollbabe gives the player more<\/i> of that kind of control through a built-in mechanic that lets the player have a HUGE amount of influence over the story.
\nLet me repeat that: not just over the character; over the story.
\nQuick example from the game system: my character is sitting on a rock somewhere. I tell the GM that I want to keep an eye out for anyone sneaking up on me. The wording is key here: in calling for a conflict resolution of some sort, I’m also calling for conflict: saying “I want to be ready if anyone sneaks up on me.” automatically means that someone IS sneaking up on me — the roll merely determines if I’m ready or not. If I say, “I want to avoid anyone sneaking up on me,” then the sneaking up is now part of the story — the check is to see if I avoided it.
\nDid you notice that the player’s<\/u> the one who determines what’s happening to them?
\nLet’s use a more Amberesque example: I, as a GM, am not that great at coming up with Political Stuff. One of my players is<\/i>, and more to the point really likes that style of play.
\nThe scene is a Party in the Castle. I ask the player what they’re up to, and they say “I want to mingle and see what I can pick up from various rumors and whatnot.”
\nNow, for the purposes of the system, this isn’t specific enough. The player needs to give me a Goal. I ask them what their goal is, and they tell me, “I want to see if Lord Feldane is trying to outmanuver me regarding the grain embargo I’ve put into place against Shadow Hyrmsmir.”
\nA ha.
\nSee, it doesn’t matter if they make their Social check or not… I as the GM now know that this<\/i> is a story element the player wants for their character. It is, in fact, now part of the story — the question is only whether or not the character knows about it. \ud83d\ude42 (Obviously, the player does.)
\nGMs: Ever feel as though, even when you’re firing on all cylinders, you’re still only giving the players — even those you know well — a really good scene about 50% of the time, just because you can’t always know what they find interesting at the moment, or what they’re in the mood for?
\nI wonder if the player<\/i> can be wrong about that. I really don’t think so.
\nWhy not just incorporate the whole mechanic into the DRPG?<\/b><\/u>
\nFrankly, I’m not sure you can. With heavily narrativist, player-empowered games like Trollbabe and InSpectres, there is a built-in mechanic that clearly determines who has influence on the Story at each moment — it’s a protected process and rightfully so, since the possibility of resentment can run high in this kind of game.
\nI suggest using the mechanic as part of the whole system because I don’t personally think the mechanic can be ported successfully into a diceless game — such things require a system to determine success and failure in Conflict that does not involve direct character-character interaction, and the two diceless systems I’m passing-familiar with (ADRPG and Nobilis) don’t have that — the only real chance of failure\/success comes from facing off against a peer — left to their own devices with no opposing actions, an Amberite or Noble *will* succeed, and that mechanic doesn’t feed back into determining Narrative Control very well.
\nAnyway. There’s my game thoughts for the evening. Go play.
\nUpdate:<\/b> Some more discussion here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There’s a game I’d like to write up in full that I never will. Two reasons: One is simply that<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-game-design"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=798"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/randomaverage.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}