Random Average

Story Games for Everybody – Go with what you know. My comments therein: … it’s a different kind of strength

I first read the phrase in Nobilis, but this quote from Mike Holmes breaks it down the best for me:

Most folks have been mentioning this for a year, but I’m just getting caught up: Five Geek Social Fallacies Geek

Every time I give up on Capes and say “You know what? I just don’t know if it’s something I’ll

Another quote from the Fruitful Void thread, and this one is awesome. Both Narrativism and Gamism strike me as “dilemma”

anyway: The Fruitful Void in Game Design A game design must demand that its human audience reach into it to

TonyLB starts a conversation about the Social Footprint inherent in various game and non-game activities — the potential time required

“Every game works better when the players trust each other enough to fully get into collaborative retelling of the world.

I’m just saying… I know how those people who restore historical buildings feel. Except… more blind.

Okay, I can’t leave this alone yet, so… check it. Let’s say we want to chart coherently Narrativist games on

You know… all this searching for common language in terms of game-stuff made me realize something else. I might never

Over in the chocolate/peanut butter post, MT said: I keep thinking that there are challenges that were made by players

So… driving home after the Shab al-Hiri Roach game (which I still haven’t written about. :P), I had this simple

me: hi 🙂     sorry,     writing big comments. Kate: i saw some of ’em.     My eyes glazed over…     🙂 me: Yep.

Awhile back, I posted a question up to the story games site, esentially asking seriously, how many sessions have your